< ?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" />
Early November is not just a nice time for the fans of Twilight and Freddy Krueger, it also seems a good time to organize elections. The second round of < ?xml:namespace prefix = st1 ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags" />
The Center for Global Development still sees some opportunities though, even in the likely case of a Republican landslide: “The 112th Congress, with its anticipated focus on fiscal restraint, could be the catalyst that achieves meaningful aid reform.” We hope it with them. With an overhaul of aid, they obviously don’t mean a rerun of DIY (Do It Yourself) foreign aid, as advertised last week by Nicholas Kristof in a NYT column. In a Foreign policy viewpoint, Dave Algoso says a few sensible things about this DIY revolution this week. Secretary of State Clinton sketches again the concept of ‘smart power’ in a Foreign Affairs essay, as well as the implications of the concept for the Global Health Initiative and other policy areas. Not sure whether ‘smart power’ is what we will see after 2 November.
On a happier note, next week the Emerging Voices will arrive in
Finally, in case you missed some global health issues of the last 6 months, we recommend “Health and development: global update”, a publication from the HSLP institute, the international health unit of the Mott MacDonald group, a global consultancy group. Check it out.
Enjoy your reading.
1. Globalization and health – Rethinking the ‘global’ in global health: a dialectic approach
Kayvan Bozorgmehr; http://www.globalizationandhealth.com/content/6/1/19
Bozorgmehr reconsiders the word ‘global’ in global health and suggests reconceptualizing ‘global’ as ‘supraterritorial’, or as ‘links between the social determinants of health anywhere in the world’. Other denotations of global, like ‘worldwide’, ‘holistic’ and ’transcending national boundaries’ all have their disadvantages.
2. ECSA Health Ministers’ Conference opens in
3. ODI –
– an emerging aid player Brazil
Lidia Cabral and Julia Weinstock; http://www.odi.org.uk/resources/details.asp?id=5120&title=brazil-election-emerging-donor-aid
In a timely briefing paper, ODI focuses on
4. Lancet – Poliomyelitis eradication: another step forward
Nigel W Crawford, Jim P Buttery; http://www.lancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(10)61427-4/fulltext
Crawford & Buttery comment on a new Lancet article by Sutter et al. on a new (bOPV) poliovirus vaccine. They consider this a major step forward in the battle against polio, and think the next two years will be crucial in the eradication endgame.
Karen Grepin also considers this excellent news, but reckons funding is still only half of what is needed.
5. PLOS (editorial) – Increased Responsibility and Transparency in an Era of Increased Visibility
The PLoS Medicine Editors; http://www.plosmedicine.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000364
6. PLOS (perspective) – Editors, Publishers, Impact Factors, and Reprint Income
In the same debate, Marcovitch calls on journals to be more transparent.
7. Guardian – We need greater transparency over aid budgets
Everybody agrees more transparency is needed over aid budgets. Two recently published indices should thus be welcomed by those who believe in transparency as a key feature of accountable governance: the Aid Transparency Assessment, published by ‘Publish What you Fund’; and the Open Budget Index, published by the International Budget Partnership this week.
8. Maxwell – Doing aid centre-right: marrying a results-based agenda with the realities of aid
Simon Maxwell explains why the recent focus on results-based aid has some development professionals in the
Nancy Birdsall (CGD) reacts.
9. BMJ (editorial) – Chinese health care in rural areas
Zhanlian Feng; http://www.bmj.com/content/341/bmj.c5254.full
Zhanliang Feng comments on a new BMJ study on the impact of NCMS, the new rural medical insurance scheme in
10. Lancet – Increased resources for the Global Fund, but pledges fall short of expected demand
Michel D Kazatchkine; http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(10)61970-8/fulltext
Kazatchkine comes back on the Global Fund replenishment and takes a rather optimistic (or is it diplomatic?) perspective. Yet, he warns that all stakeholders should make efforts to get the promises fulfilled. Apparently, he expects quite a bit from the French G8 and G20 presidency next year.
Kazatchkine is also fairly positive about the Japanese contribution to the GF. Jeffrey Sachs thinks the Japanese government could do more, and, being Sachs, says so in a Japanese newspaper.
A very positive evolution for the GF, as pointed out in a NYT letter, is the fact that there are for the first time pledges from African nations and support from the African private sector through the “Gift From Africa” campaign.
11. Lancet – GAVI’s challenges: funding and leadership
The Editors from the Lancet comment on the poor replenishment campaign of GAVI so far. They stress that money has to be found by June next year. Therefore a charismatic leader should be appointed.
12. Euromapping 2010
Euromapping 2010, supported by Countdown 2015
Action for Global Health also has a new tool, Action tracker, to commemorate the 40th anniversary of the UN Member States’ commitment to give 0.7 % of GDP to aid. This tool tracks EU support for Global Health.
13. ODI – Equity: a key to macroeconomic stability
In an ODI opinion, Milo Vandemoortele points out the key role played by equity in the search for macroeconomic stability. Equity, policy space and strong institutions all contribute to macroeconomic resilience, and are linked.
14. Lancet – A counterfeit drug treaty: great idea, wrong implementation
Bate & Attaran consider a counterfeit drug treaty a timely idea. Yet, the treaty should be initiated by the WHO.
15. Pharmabizz –
takes lead for guiding developing countries to drive WHO focus on public health instead of IPR India
Joseph Alexander; http://www.pharmabiz.com/article/detnews.asp?articleid=58072§ionid